A realistic two-quadrature seam experiment
Date: 24 October 2026 Status: buildable interface experiment with preregistered observables; tests the seam carrier, not new gravity Evidence: machine-readable protocol Certificate: signal-model verifier
Purpose
Test the exact prediction of the sewing-response gate:
a coherent two-quadrature detector can retain an orientation-odd seam amplitude that a power-only detector necessarily squares away.
This is a test of the proposed interface type. Conventional coupled-mode theory predicts the basic effect, so observing it is theoretical engineering rather than evidence for new physics. Its value is to establish a calibrated physical carrier on which the stronger corpus intertwiners can later be tested.
Preferred platform
Use two coupled microwave resonators with a parametrically controlled complex coupling
A vector network analyser or coherent microwave source plus IQ mixer measures the complex transmission amplitude. Tunable superconducting-resonator couplers and phase-sensitive microwave detection are established technologies; an optical Mach--Zehnder or programmable photonic mesh with balanced homodyne readout is a direct alternative.
The minimal effective model is
The two independently programmed pump quadratures set \(g_x\) and \(g_y\). The seam reversal is implemented by shifting the pump phase by \(\pi\):
Measurement channels
Calibrate the background and extract the complex seam-dependent amplitude
Measure two records from the same acquisition.
Orientation-even control
It is unchanged under \(\epsilon\mapsto-\epsilon\).
Orientation-odd record
With a coherent reference \(A_{\rm ref}=|A_{\rm ref}|e^{i\theta}\), record
The antisymmetrized statistic
is linear in \(r\), reverses sign with the seam, and varies sinusoidally with \(\phi-\theta\).
Run matrix
For each radius \(r\), acquire a randomized sequence over
plus:
- reference on and reference off;
- \(+\epsilon\) and \(-\epsilon\);
- both quadratures, \(g_x\)-only and \(g_y\)-only;
- coherent averaging and deliberately phase-scrambled averaging;
- coupled device and coupling-disabled baseline.
Use at least five nonzero radii spanning the linear-response range and repeat the full randomized block across multiple thermal/drift cycles.
Preregistered fits
Fit
and
The interface passes only if:
- \(D_{\rm odd}\) is linear at small \(r\) and reverses under \(\epsilon\mapsto-\epsilon\);
- its fitted phase follows the programmed pump phase;
- it vanishes under reference removal or phase scrambling;
- \(P_{\rm even}\) is unchanged by seam reversal and begins quadratically;
- the result survives a held-out calibration block and a second readout phase.
Nuisance model
Fit or independently calibrate:
- IQ gain imbalance and quadrature skew;
- cable delay and reference-phase drift;
- direct feedthrough around the resonators;
- unequal linewidths and detuning;
- pump leakage into the readout;
- amplifier compression;
- nonreciprocal or dissipative coupling;
- slow temperature and bias drift.
The primary falsifier is a purported odd record reproduced by IQ leakage from the even power channel. Phase scrambling and reference-off runs directly test that failure.
The two-resonator transfer preflight adds a second essential control. Coherent direct feedthrough can manufacture a linear odd term in raw power. Measuring and subtracting the coupling-disabled complex baseline removes that false channel while retaining the calibrated homodyne reference.
Interpretation ladder
| Outcome | Meaning |
|---|---|
| odd channel absent after calibration | this implementation does not retain the seam |
| odd channel present but removable by port rephasing | ordinary convention-dependent coherent response |
| odd channel obeys the full run matrix | operational two-quadrature seam carrier |
| response additionally follows a source-derived modular/Leech parameter map with no refit | evidence for the proposed mathematical interface |
| unexplained residual survives the complete conventional model and independent replication | candidate anomaly requiring a new-physics audit |
The first successful experiment should be expected to stop at the third row. That is still useful: it builds the detector required by the theory without claiming the theory has already supplied the coupling.
The two-mode phase-gauge gate further limits that interpretation. A single complex coupling phase is removable inside an isolated two-mode Hamiltonian. The measured odd phase is meaningful relative to the pump and local oscillator; an intrinsic device phase requires a closed three-mode coupling loop.
Existing technical precedents
- Peropadre et al., tunable complex couplings and effective gauge fields between superconducting resonators
- Taballione et al., a fully tunable twelve-mode photonic interferometer
- Tuite and Zuevsky, genus-two fermionic sewing