Scope
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “two edges identify; three edges audit”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 3 of 3
two edges identify; three edges audit
Experiment / protocolBuilder
Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Exact assertion
This does not supply the missing physics. The heavy-meson coefficients, top/weak collider interference, third bottom/weak process and signed electroweak matching matrix remain uncomputed. It does make the invitation buildable: publish the signed response table and covariance, require positivity and held-out prediction, then let the third edge decide whether the joined graph is physical structure or only coordinated naming.
What this commits us to
The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.
Logical anatomy
Evidence posture
Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.
Research move
constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Verification route
- Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
- Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
- Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
- Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.
What would move or defeat this claim
Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.
Source map
Controlling documents
- admissibility 73 signed edge extraction and cycle auditOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 72 candidate phase edges and scale bridgeOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 71 observable resolution and phase connectivity gateOpen controlling document →