Scope
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the third edge tests the whole triangle”. This is assertion 1 of 3 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 3
the third edge tests the whole triangle
Experiment / protocolBuilder
Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Exact assertion
A published broken-phase W-associated axion calculation already retains independent top and bottom couplings with mixed terms. This moves the candidate up–down phase edge into the same broad electroweak process family as the top-like and weak-gauge emission topologies. It does not yet supply a three-coupling calculation, but it removes the assumption that sign identification must begin by joining a collider process to a heavy-meson decay.
What this commits us to
The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.
Logical anatomy
Evidence posture
Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.
Research move
constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Verification route
- Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
- Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
- Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
- Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.
What would move or defeat this claim
Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.
Source map
Controlling documents
- admissibility 74 one family triangle and global positivity gateOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 73 signed edge extraction and cycle auditOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 66 contextual triangle bound reduces to standard positivityOpen controlling document →