Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 1

the G2 scar moves upstream

Interpretive mapIntegrator

Organizes thought or workflow but is not evidence for a physical claim. joins several typed results while letting the weakest edge set the claim.

Exact assertion

The D4/\(\mathbb Z_3\) fold really does carry a threefold weight, but after canonical normalization its complete damped two-channel transfer is exactly an ordinary coupled-oscillator response; coherent phase and sideband records remove AM/FM blindness without identifying a G2 origin. The surviving experiment must retain the quotient map: a four-resonator D4 star driven through its symmetric central port has two accessible modes, while unequal addressed detunings of the three outer resonators raise the accessible Krylov rank to four and removal restores rank two. This closes the two-channel root-scar claim by no-go and relocates the positive target to a controlled dark-mode release; fundamental G2 interpretation would still require a source-native triality carrier.

What this commits us to

The claim supplies a map or analogy. It becomes a derivation only after an explicit carrier-preserving map and invariant are given.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the G2 scar moves upstream”. This is assertion 1 of 1 in that section.

Evidence posture

Treat the passage as organization or analogy unless a cited carrier-preserving map is supplied.

Research move

joins several typed results while letting the weakest edge set the claim.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Provide an explicit map that preserves the claimed structure, then identify an observable consequence that the analogy alone did not supply.

Source map

Controlling documents