the detector has two different jobs

Exact assertion

There is a second, independent information gate. Rates on the up, bottom and weak-anomaly amplitudes leave two relative-sign choices after a global convention. One interference term fixes only one. Testing the signed relation therefore requires two coherent phase links that connect all three amplitudes. The ideal contrasts are large; the open task is to find source-matched common processes and carry their electroweak and detector covariance without fitting the answer afterward.

What this commits us to

The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.

Logical anatomy

Verification route

1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.

Source map

Controlling documents

• admissibility 71 observable resolution and phase connectivity gateOpen controlling document →
• admissibility 70 running high energy rank windowOpen controlling document →
• programme lane expansion 37 the five coordinate observable map needs bottom weak and neutrino compassesOpen controlling document →