Scope
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the detector has two different jobs”. This is assertion 2 of 3 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 2 of 3
the detector has two different jobs
Experiment / protocolBuilder
Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Exact assertion
Orientation is part of the measurement. A few degrees of analyser error can leak as much leading response as the entire second mode, and keeping that leakage below ten percent requires roughly seven-tenths of a degree alignment. A scalar sensitivity number is therefore not an adequate detector description; the apparatus must reconstruct the response direction and its covariance.
What this commits us to
The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.
Logical anatomy
Evidence posture
Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.
Research move
constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Verification route
- Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
- Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
- Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
- Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.
What would move or defeat this claim
Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.
Source map
Controlling documents
- admissibility 71 observable resolution and phase connectivity gateOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 70 running high energy rank windowOpen controlling document →
- programme lane expansion 37 the five coordinate observable map needs bottom weak and neutrino compassesOpen controlling document →