Scope
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “two edges identify; three edges audit”. This is assertion 1 of 3 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 3
two edges identify; three edges audit
Experiment / protocolBuilder
Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Exact assertion
The candidate phase links now have a finite extraction protocol. A signed nine-setting grid separates the baseline, possible linear response, both self-responses and the cross-response in every differential bin. Three leftover contrasts test whether the quadratic description itself survives. The cross-response must also remain inside the ordinary positivity bound set by the two self-responses.
What this commits us to
The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.
Logical anatomy
Evidence posture
Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.
Research move
constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Verification route
- Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
- Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
- Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
- Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.
What would move or defeat this claim
Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.
Source map
Controlling documents
- admissibility 73 signed edge extraction and cycle auditOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 72 candidate phase edges and scale bridgeOpen controlling document →
- admissibility 71 observable resolution and phase connectivity gateOpen controlling document →