Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 3 of 3

the selector chip has a design wedge

Experiment / protocolBuilder

Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Exact assertion

Selection must remain a separate intervention. A passive anisotropic section strong enough to attract one dark direction is itself splitting or differential loss, so leaving it active during the holonomy stage can counterfeit choice by ordinary mode filtering. The next useful build has a neutral holonomy stage, reference port, independently calibrated and switchable Y stage, and Y-off/Y-on multi-input tomography. Passing would be theoretical engineering; new physics would still require a source-native reason for nature to choose that carrier and selector.

What this commits us to

The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the selector chip has a design wedge”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.

Research move

constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.

Source map

Controlling documents