Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 3

the selector chip has a design wedge

Experiment / protocolBuilder

Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Exact assertion

The integrated-photonic carrier now has a finite coupled-mode design window. The strict two-percent adiabatic budget requires coupling–length product at least 207.7968; an illustrative 20 per millimetre, 12 mm schedule passes the adiabatic, accumulated splitting, accumulated differential-loss, dark-retention and nonunitarity tests when the unmeasured residual ratios are each assumed to be one part in ten thousand. Those assumptions are design targets, not properties inferred from published matrix fidelity or insertion loss.

What this commits us to

The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the selector chip has a design wedge”. This is assertion 1 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.

Research move

constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.

Source map

Controlling documents