Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 2

the phase target is relative, not absolute

ConditionalAuditor

Works after a named field, coefficient, boundary condition or control is supplied. checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.

Exact assertion

The free-Majorana part of the Monster 2A route now has exact reduced T1 and S₁ actions on all ten even genus-two spin sectors. The earlier exp(i*pi/4) fixed-sector phase was genuine but not yet an intrinsic device flux: a common anomaly-line convention can shift every phase assigned to one generator. What survives is relational. Under T1, a fixed-sector phase squared divided by a two-cycle product is exactly i. Under S₁, the odd--odd fixed sector divided by an even--even fixed sector is also i. Both comparisons survive sector rephasing and a common generator phase.

What this commits us to

The construction is admitted only after the named additional input is supplied. The page records the dependency instead of hiding it inside the conclusion.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the phase target is relative, not absolute”. This is assertion 1 of 2 in that section.

Evidence posture

Identify the named external input and verify that the construction follows after it is supplied.

Research move

checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Show that the named input is inconsistent, insufficient, unavailable, or fails to imply the claimed construction.

Source map

Controlling documents