Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 2 of 3

the four-mode bench is ready to build

Experiment / protocolBuilder

Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Exact assertion

The detector logic now has two independent residues. Along a weak centred detuning ladder, the correction left by eliminating the outer modes begins quadratically because the first moment cancels. In the resolved setting, exchanging two physical outer ports reverses an ordered contrast cubic while leaving the unordered quadratic and product data unchanged. Across 5,000 frozen component-tolerance draws, every device retains more than twelve linewidths of minimum pole separation, more than four percent hub visibility and the preregistered rank-conditioning margin.

What this commits us to

The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the four-mode bench is ready to build”. This is assertion 2 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.

Research move

constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.

Source map

Controlling documents