Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 3 of 3

the Casimir bridge has a frequency window

Experiment / protocolBuilder

Defines a measurement, sensitivity calculation or empirical decision rule. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Exact assertion

The nearest work is now spectroscopy, not force metrology: measure complex diagonal and off-diagonal conductivity on one batch or specimen in both magnetic states from DC through at least 0.1 to 1 eV, fit one passive causal posterior with covariance, and freeze its continuation to imaginary frequency. Only if the predicted parallel-minus-antiparallel force or torque exceeds optical-tail, patch, roughness, magnetic, drift and separation uncertainties should a no-refit force experiment advance. A null remains useful material and metrology engineering; a residual becomes a new-physics lead only after that complete conventional closure fails.

What this commits us to

The claim concerns a protocol, sensitivity or decision rule. It must be kept separate from a prediction that a nonzero signal exists.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “the Casimir bridge has a frequency window”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Separate predicted signal from sensitivity, calibration and decision protocol.

Research move

constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Specify the apparatus, calibration, null distribution, preregistered threshold and independently predicted effect size.

Source map

Controlling documents