Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 3 of 3

name the coordinates before reading the signs

Obstruction / no-goAuditor

A stated candidate class or identification has been ruled out under explicit assumptions. checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.

Exact assertion

This matters before combining the ALP papers: the chiral rotations used to define the top and bottom fermion coefficients also shift anomalous gauge couplings. The next deliverable is one signed operator dictionary—including anomaly normalization, running, threshold matching and covariance—followed by the 27-setting response in that basis. Rank and positivity come first; edge signs become physical statements only inside the declared dictionary.

What this commits us to

A specified candidate class fails under explicit assumptions. The conclusion does not automatically extend to mechanisms outside that class.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “name the coordinates before reading the signs”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Check the assumptions defining the ruled-out candidate class; the no-go does not automatically extend beyond that class.

Research move

checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Break one of the no-go assumptions in a controlled construction, or show that the alleged obstruction does not follow within its stated class.

Source map

Controlling documents