Admissibility frontier · Edition 3

Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 3

a zero mode does not fix its detector weight

Interpretive mapIntegrator

Organizes thought or workflow but is not evidence for a physical claim. joins several typed results while letting the weakest edge set the claim.

Exact assertion

A minimal chiral wall was deformed through six profiles while its one zero mode, signed index and nonzero gap were held fixed. The centre-port residue nevertheless changed by more than a factor of three, and localization changed with it. A protected pole therefore does not supply a protected detector weight.

What this commits us to

The claim supplies a map or analogy. It becomes a derivation only after an explicit carrier-preserving map and invariant are given.

Logical anatomy

Scope

Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “a zero mode does not fix its detector weight”. This is assertion 1 of 3 in that section.

Evidence posture

Treat the passage as organization or analogy unless a cited carrier-preserving map is supplied.

Research move

joins several typed results while letting the weakest edge set the claim.

Verification route

  1. Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
  2. Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
  3. Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
  4. Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.

What would move or defeat this claim

Provide an explicit map that preserves the claimed structure, then identify an observable consequence that the analogy alone did not supply.

Source map

Controlling documents