Scope
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “a loop and its outcome are different objects”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 3 of 3
A stated candidate class or identification has been ruled out under explicit assumptions. checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.
Exact assertion
The experiment must therefore pair complex eigenvalue and biorthogonal left/right tomography with both initial states, both orientations, a rate ladder and unnormalized gain/loss. An EP-excluding loop with matched imaginary-spectrum exposure tests whether chirality belongs to winding or to the propagator. A useful asymmetric switch may be entirely real engineering while still being the wrong evidence for a topological or spontaneous-selection claim.
A specified candidate class fails under explicit assumptions. The conclusion does not automatically extend to mechanisms outside that class.
Chapter “The admissibility frontier”, section “a loop and its outcome are different objects”. This is assertion 3 of 3 in that section.
Check the assumptions defining the ruled-out candidate class; the no-go does not automatically extend beyond that class.
checks assumptions, certificates, counterexamples and stopping rules.
Break one of the no-go assumptions in a controlled construction, or show that the alleged obstruction does not follow within its stated class.
Source map