Scope
Chapter “Proton safety, Pati–Salam and triality”, section “Complete multiplets are not automatically safe”. This is assertion 1 of 1 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 1 of 1
Complete multiplets are not automatically safe
Obstruction / no-goBuilder
A stated candidate class or identification has been ruled out under explicit assumptions. constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Exact assertion
Unified representations carry wanted and unwanted channels together. The proton-safe projector exists only after reducing the colour–lepton symmetry that made the complete multiplet attractive in the first place.
What this commits us to
A specified candidate class fails under explicit assumptions. The conclusion does not automatically extend to mechanisms outside that class.
Logical anatomy
Evidence posture
Check the assumptions defining the ruled-out candidate class; the no-go does not automatically extend beyond that class.
Research move
constructs a model, mechanism, calculation, protocol or intervention.
Verification route
- Recover the declared objects and assumptions from the controlling documents.
- Check the calculation, construction, obstruction or stopping rule on those same objects.
- Compare the source conclusion with the exact assertion above; do not strengthen its verbs or enlarge its domain.
- Apply the status rule and retain every named external dependency.
What would move or defeat this claim
Break one of the no-go assumptions in a controlled construction, or show that the alleged obstruction does not follow within its stated class.
Source map
Controlling documents
- the unified vector triplet gives two FCp arms one safe extra and three proton decay channels all with BminusL zeroOpen controlling document →
- the proton safe current projector exists only after breaking the pati salam colour lepton rootsOpen controlling document →