Scope
Chapter “The Furey interface”, section “What a representation does”. This is assertion 2 of 2 in that section.
Expanded claim page · assertion 2 of 2
Organizes thought or workflow but is not evidence for a physical claim. moves a structure between mathematical, physical or ordinary languages.
Exact assertion
The present programme does not claim that the names of those algebras make the particles inevitable. It asks the narrower question: can a specifically typed Furey-shaped channel act on the response carrier and close the missing generators?
The claim supplies a map or analogy. It becomes a derivation only after an explicit carrier-preserving map and invariant are given.
Chapter “The Furey interface”, section “What a representation does”. This is assertion 2 of 2 in that section.
Treat the passage as organization or analogy unless a cited carrier-preserving map is supplied.
moves a structure between mathematical, physical or ordinary languages.
Provide an explicit map that preserves the claimed structure, then identify an observable consequence that the analogy alone did not supply.
Source map